KingCast and Mortgage Movies Update on Yet Another Wells Fargo Multiple Allonge Fraudulent Foreclosure in Snohomish County No. 16-2-02643-3. - After The Mortgage

ADSENSE HERE


Oh, brother. Remember last year when I told you about the file that had the two Allonges in it, one direct from Deep Green to Wachovia/Wells Fargo and one endorsed in blank?  And how when I asked WF which one was attached to the Note, they told me it was the one in blank....  which was bullshit because they are only saying that so that they can play the bearer paper game, right:  Holder of the Note has the Right to Foreclose.

You see, when I asked for the Original Note it was MIA but they had some guy who actually worked at Kay Jewelers or Zales -- one of the two I forget -- sign a Lost Note Affidavit even though he couldn't have any Actual or Constructive Knowledge of what the hell he was talking about because he was busy slinging lowbrow jewelry to the masses when the family allegedly signed the Note. Insane, right?  But welcome to the Wacky World of Wells Fargo. Honorable U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Robert Drain cracked Wells Fargo's head open over similar fabrications not long ago so one would think they would learn, right? Apparently not, so they want to pass this Rule 11 hot mess on to the next Counsel, so I can go badger them when it comes time for a public Court hearing right.


Well anyway since that time we've seen Marie McDonnell review the purported Allonges and she agreed and went on to say that they're not even recordable documents.

Meanwhile in the related Foreclosure Case Snohomish County No. 16-2-02643-3, Wells Fargo even committed a Rule 11 violation in my opinion by arguing that they were in First Position. This is an argument heretofore never advanced and believe me I have been deep into it with their Routh, Crabtree & Olsen ("RCO") attorneys for more than a year as a housing advocate before referring it out to Learned Counsel Scott Stafne.   So Ms. McDonnell and Attorney Stafne worked together and Counterclaimed a Fair Debt Collection Practices ("FDCPA") Action, which apparently predicated RCO or the client (WF) to punt for new, Special Counsel, identity not disclosed. And when I say not disclosed, I mean not disclosed for a couple of weeks now to my understanding.

The family's renewed offer of Settlement remains stagnant and on the table, I guess. Guessing is all one can do at this point because none of this makes any sense. Read the recent emails below with RCO Attorneys Synova M.L. Edwards and Janaya L. Carter at the helm:



I have followed up with the client as to special counsel and will provide additional information as soon as it is available.

Thank you,

Synova M. L. Edwards  
Associate Attorney  
Licensed to Practice Law in Washington  
Direct: 425.628.6209
Fax: 425.440.6043
smedwards@rcolegal.com

********
From: Janaya L. Carter
Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2016 10:54 AM
To: 'Christopher King'; Michelle Stanley; Sarah Beeson; Synova M. L. Edwards
Cc: cmizerplus; Scott Stafne
Subject: RE: Going to Production on follow-up to K and A C_________ lawsuit and FDCPA violations

1.  Your belief that WF was in the First Position-I have discussed this matter with Mr. Staffne.
2.  The identity of new, special Counsel- Synova, do you know who new counsel is and when they may appear?
3.  Your client's position on Settlement and apparent Bad Faith failure to respond to Mr. Chrisman's Offer of Settlement- We have provided this to our client and are waiting on a response. 

Janaya L. Carter 
Managing Shareholder 
Licensed to Practice Law in Idaho, Oregon and Washington 
Direct: 425.586.1991 
Mobile: 206.420.9400 
Fax: 425.283.5991 
jcarter@rcolegal.com

************
On Aug 23, 2016, at 02:57 PM, Christopher King <kingcast955@icloud.com> wrote:
Dear Attorney Carter:

We have not spoken yet but you may have heard my  two-allonge phone call on the C____________ file.

It is my understanding that you and your client basically committed a Rule 11 & FDCPA violation by falsely claiming that Wells Fargo was in the First Position. Mr. C__________ informs me that he in turn filed an FDCPA Counterclaim as you and your client knew they had no colorable claim relative to your position.

Mr. C___________ also informs me that he and his Counsel made you and your client a Settlement offer that remains unanswered, and he further informs that you and your client have represented that new, special Counsel is joining, has joined, or may possibly be about to be joining this case.

Could you please clarify your client's position before I go to press this Friday, 26 August, on:
1.  Your belief that WF was in the First Position;
2.  The identity of new, special Counsel, and;
3.  Your client's position on Settlement and apparent Bad Faith failure to respond to Mr. C____________ Offer of Settlement.

Relative to my phone call on this, there are pictures of the allonges you can download at the link below; I know that Marie McDonnell researched them and she agreed with me that not only are they fraudulent, they're not even real, valid recordable documents. I was a Title Insurance producer/Closing Escrow Attorney by the way so it's not my first time at the rodeo, so to speak.

You may know of my by way of Wetmore v.NWTS, a prior case involving, in part, my journalism.

Attorney Edwards is well aware of the history and is therefore copied on this email.

Please advise.




from Mortgage Movies Journal http://ift.tt/2bwkyvR
KingCast and Mortgage Movies Update on Yet Another Wells Fargo Multiple Allonge Fraudulent Foreclosure in Snohomish County No. 16-2-02643-3. - After The Mortgage ADSENSE HERE
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)