Here is your background about the abusive white male of privilege who basically assaulted me during a public hearing in which I was lawfully seated and running video, following the Rule and Law of the case. As it turns out, the creep who did it is allegedly represented by yet another creep whose initial claim to fame was representing a Frat House known for inappropriate conduct. Anyway, the attorney of record has not actually signed a single pleading. That's per se illegal, but the Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Responsibility has steadfastly ignored that fact.
So Iet them have it, but good.
I am moving to Strike the Pleadings and to Recuse Terry E. Johnson as Counsel for Respondent Mark Rattan, as it is now patently obvious that he is receiving special favors by way of his membership on the relevant Wisconsin Office of Lawyer Responsibility Committee:
We live in a Nation of Laws, dammit. And when the fucking law in Wisconsin says the Attorney of Record has to sign the Pleadings and Filings, that is exactly what it means.
802.05 Signing of pleadings, motions, and other papers; representations to court; sanctions.(1) Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's individual name, or, if the party is not represented by an attorney, shall be signed by the party. Each paper shall state the signer's address and telephone number, and state bar number, if any. Except when otherwise specifically provided by rule or statute, pleadings need not be verified or accompanied by affidavit. An unsigned paper shall be stricken unless omission of the signature is corrected promptly after being called to the attention of the attorney or party.
The purpose of requiring a handwritten signature on pleadings, made by the attorney of record, is not only to clarify who is accountable for an invalid claim, but also to guarantee that an attorney who is familiar with the procedural and substantive laws of state has read the claims and has made an assessment of the claims' validity. Schaefer v. Riegelman (2002) 639 N.W.2d 715, 250 Wis.2d 494. Pleading 288 *505
¶ 17 Section 802.05(1)(a) clearly lays out the basic requirements for a sufficient signature on a complaint. The signature must (1) be handwritten; (2) be the signature of an attorney of record; and (3) be in that attorney's name. Although the signature in this case was handwritten, it was not the signature of the attorney of record in that attorney's own name. Because no attorney of record signed the pleadings in accordance with § 802.05(1)(a), the pleadings were defective. To the extent that Novak left anything less than clear, Shaefer was unambiguous: (5) defect in pleadings was fundamental and, thus, circuit court lacked jurisdiction over attorney, overruling Novak v. Phillips, 246 Wis.2d 673, 631 N.W.2d 635.
Schiessle v. Karls 2010 WL 7746448 (Dane Cty 2010) is inapposite: There was no basis for Prejudice because the case had just been initiated and no legal theorems had been argued. That is vastly the opposite from this case, in which Complaining Party raised the issue months ago only to have Respondent chortle at him and attempt to mock him, repeatedly. i.e. 13 Nov.
Sorry—you are only permitted to get one substantive comment from me in one day. Terry E. Johnson
OK Terry, Your Move, Bro.
from Mortgage Movies Journal http://ift.tt/2n4dMqc
KingCast and Mortgage Movies See Wisconsin Bar Slam Superlawyer Terry Johnson Over Unsigned Pleadings. - After The Mortgage ADSENSE HERE